I hate metaslaving

Whenever games get competitive, something called a “meta” develops over time and hence certain “successful” developments or patterns in the way people play a game appear more often, resulting in a (usually) everchanging meta.

In League of Legends, I usually play in the Support role. My champion pool is quite varied with a lot of beefy tanks that can engage quite heavily on the enemies like Nautilus, Thresh, Leona and Bard… and with a lot of cool enchanters that empower and heal allies, preventing them from dying, like Nami, Sona, Lulu and Bard… and with a lot of strong mages that are able to whittle down the enemies’ HP-bars before fights or even kill them on your own – like Morgana, Brand, Xerath and Bard!

This is Bard’s “Bard Bard” skin where Bard is a “bard”.
I really like Bard.
Bard’s love, Bard’s life.

Overall, I really enjoy a lot of support champions but sadly, the meta is a thing and therefore you usually only play certain champions on each role. In the support role in this season of League of Legends, the meta is basically consisting of a meta of the holy “Tank-Trinity”: Leona, Nautilus and Thresh. You pick one of these champions and you win (if you know what you’re doing)… and while I know what I’m doing with these champions, I don’t really enjoy playing them as much as the mages and enchanters in my champion pool right now and hence, I come to my point:

I hate metaslaving.

Being a “slave” to the meta is a bit strong but a lot of people who try to climb in League have to resort to doing it. They need to stick to the champions with the highest pick and win rates and have to play these champions to essentially win games.

Vladimir, eh, don’t like him all that much, although I should like him, I guess?

A good example for this would be Mid Lane where you either pick Kassadin or Vladimir… or you ban them. They are really strong with no counterplay whatsoever and are essentially face-roll-champions that don’t get nerfed no matter what happens. (Sorry for the rant.)

If you belong to the 0.50% of League of Legends’ player-base that plays Tristana Mid, then I’m quite sorry to let you know that you will lose with a probability of 41.91% (Most champions have a win rate between 45 to 55% unless they are not balanced for that role). If you are a Tristana-Midlane-One-Trick-Pony you might enjoy this kind of playstyle but you probably will have it hard to actually make this playstyle work and climb efficiently. Instead, you’ll have to resort to metaslaving and play either something broken (not gonna rant again) or something that is actually good right now in Mid-Lane (not judging) like Galio, Zoe, Talon or Zed (just according to win rates compared to pick rates).

And I guess not everyone likes League of Legends, so I guess I could and actually should talk about metaslaving in other games.

The Revoker – the best crucible sniper, period.
(I’ve been told that and I’ve been killed by that quite often.)

In Destiny 2, for instance, I really enjoy using double-primary-ammo with Storm and Stress (or rather Sturm und Drang) but people don’t really do that… and well, I am not that good in Crucible as I am using a sidearm and a hand cannon (fair enough).

If I don’t use those two weapons, I usually go for Bug-Out-Bag and a shotgun, which works, I guess… but there are weapons in the meta that are a must-have for anyone who wants to climb fast.

In card games, a lot of the times, only certain decks with certain cards in it work. If you are missing one card or two from having the perfect deck, you either grind it out until you have it – or you just replace the missing cards with something similar. My Quest Shaman, in Hearthstone, has been meta for quite some time… sadly, ever since the dragons came out… I can’t really use it and need some extra cards, which is rather annoying, in my opinion.

Couldn’t be bothered to take or search for a screenshot of my quest shaman deck, so I took this one instead since I like Hollow Knight.

But then again, I don’t play games to conform to a meta. I play games to have fun. And I don’t want to play those tank supports, I don’t want to use the Revoker or Bygones in D2, and I don’t want to grind some stupid dragon cards that will get replaced soon anyways.
But it’s something that can’t be changed anyway, as a meta always develops with every change that comes out and every effort to make PvP or PvE more balanced… and that’s something that I don’t like but I guess I can’t change it and it’s just how things go.

Cheers.

This post is part of a challenge called BLAPRIL. The goal is to post as much as possible during the 30 days of April. There are different themes during some of the weeks and a lot of mentors, newbies and participants participating. Feel free to check this hub-post out and check out the other participants!

3 Comments

  1. As someone who typically avoids activities that are directly competitive, I typically disregard the “meta” as it were. It is interesting to note, though, that there are different forms of meta. The unbalanced kind is a large and noticeable mechanic or numbers-based superiority.

    In many cases, like FFXIV, the meta can sometimes be less than 1% difference in outcome, so unless you want to literally be #1, it could be somewhat flexible as long as you were functional. As long as you have the minimum iLvl, understand the fight, and know how to manage your cooldowns, the details of exactly which job you were on or how your materia was set up had little importance.

    Yeah, maybe Warriors do the most DPS, but Dark Knights and Pallys are perfectly functional tanks, and maybe being uber-dps-tank isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. When I tried to do savage-level content (pre-ShB) I couldn’t get the “required” dps out of Dark Knight even *with* the meta.

    I’m a numbers guy, though, and I often find it hard to argue with the meta. It usually exists because it is, in fact, the most numerically efficient setup. If I feel like I “have to” use the meta, though, I get really resentful of it. I usually still try it though. There have been a few times where I enjoyed it and understood better after having tried it. I don’t like having my options closed though. As they say, “you don’t pay my sub.”

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Well, MMOs quite often are a different thing than Mobas for instance. In MOBAs off-meta-picks either work (like funnel-strategies and cheese-picks like Kalista Top or Soraka/Sona Top in LoL) or they are considered a troll pick like “Nami Jungle” that usually gets abused by the enemy and results in a loss.
      In Games like League of Legends (or DotA 2 etc), conforming with the meta is really important and makes more of a difference than in Final Fantasy or so 🙂

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.